Thrombopoietin Receptor Agonists and Other Second-Line Therapies for Immune Thrombocytopenia: A Narrative Review With a Focus on Drug Access in Canada.

INTRODUCTION: Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an autoimmune disease characterized by low platelet counts and increased risk of bleeding. After corticosteroids with or without intravenous immune globulin (first-line treatment), second-line treatment options include rituximab, splenectomy, thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs), and fostamatinib. In Canada, the choice of second-line therapy is influenced by access to medications. The goals of this narrative review are to 1) summarize the evidence for the use of TPO-RAs and other second-line therapies in ITP and 2) highlight differences in public funding criteria for TPO-RAs across provinces and territories in Canada. METHODS: We conducted a literature review of second-line therapies for ITP. We solicited information on public funding programs for TPO-RAs in Canada from health care providers, pharmacists, and provincial ministries of health. RESULTS: Head-to-head trials involving TPO-RAs, rituximab, splenectomy, and fostamatinib are lacking. There is substantial evidence of effect for TPO-RAs in improving platelet count levels, health-related quality of life, bleeding, and fatigue from placebo-controlled trials and observational studies; however, access to TPO-RAs through provincial funding programs in Canada is variable. Splenectomy failure is a prerequisite for the funding of TPO-RAs in Ontario, Manitoba, and Saskatchewan, but not in Alberta or Quebec. Other provinces either do not have access to public funding or funding is provided on a case-by-case basis. DISCUSSION: TPO-RAs are effective second-line therapies for the treatment of ITP; however, access is variable across Canada, which results in health disparities and poor uptake of international treatment guidelines.

The problem of immune thrombocytopenia refractory to both eltrombopag and romiplostim.

Immune thrombocytopenia refractory to multiple thrombopoietin receptor agonists remains a challenging clinical problem. This commentary discusses and contextualizes the recent report on this entity from Moulis and colleagues, and how to move forward with these patients. Commentary on: Moulis et al. Difficult-to-treat primary immune thrombocytopenia in adults: Prevalence and burden. Results from the CARMEN-France Registry. Br J Haematol 2024;204:1476-1482.

Thrombopoietin receptor agonist and rituximab combination therapy in patients with refractory primary immune thrombocytopenia.

The aim of our study was to evaluate the efficacy of this therapy in patients with refractory primary immune thrombocytopenia. It is crucial to develop alternative treatment methods for this patient group in order to achieve better response. This combination therapy combines two different mechanisms of action, which is promising in terms of targeting pathophysiology of immune thrombocytopenia. We conducted a retrospective study, which included all patients who were diagnosed with refractory primary immune thrombocytopenia and received TPO-RA and rituximab at the General Hematology Department, Copernicus Memorial Hospital in Lodz, Poland. We assessed the response, time to response and treatment-free remission (TFR). After 1 month of treatment, the complete response (CR1, PLT >100 g/l) was achieved in 62.5% patients, and response (R1, PLT >30 g/l) was achieved in 62.5% patients. The median PLT was 175 × 10 9 /l. Within 1 month of treatment, 87.5% of patients achieved TFR. Adequately, after 6 months, CR6 and R6 was 62.5 and 75%. The median PLT was 182 × 10 9 /l. Treatment-free remission 6 months after completion was in 50% of patients. The study group achieved response to treatment, which suggests that combination of TPO-RA and rituximab is effective and relatively well tolerated. Prospective study on larger group of patients is needed to better evaluate the efficiency and safety of this treatment.

Face validity of the Kids' ITP Tools (KIT) in the era of thrombopoietin receptor agonists.

The Kids' ITP Tools (KIT) is a questionnaire to assess quality of life of children with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). The aim of this study was to update this previously validated tool to align with changes in clinical practice, specifically, treatment with thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs). Children aged 1-18 with ITP and/or their families were recruited to participate in interviews to review the KIT. Twenty-six interviews were conducted. Based on interview data from children and families, current guidelines, and expert opinion, five changes were made to the KIT in order to improve its face validity.

Optimal management of chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia with thrombopoietin receptor agonists.

Chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia (CIT) is a common complication of antineoplastic therapy, resulting in antineoplastic therapy dose reductions, treatment delays, treatment discontinuation, and morbid bleeding events. Despite several decades of research into thrombopoietic growth factors in CIT, there are presently no available U.S. FDA- or EMA-approved agents to treat CIT. However, a respectable body of evidence has been published evaluating the thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs) for the management and prevention of CIT in patients with solid tumors, and critical studies are ongoing with the TPO-RAs romiplostim and avatrombopag. When employed in the appropriate patient population and used properly, TPO-RAs can successfully and safely manage CIT for extended periods of time with minimal apparent risks. This comprehensive review discusses the evidence for TPO-RAs in CIT in patients with solid tumors, provides detailed guidance for their use in the clinic, and discusses ongoing essential clinical trials in management of CIT.

Efficacy and safety of thrombopoietin receptor agonists in solid tumors with chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia: a meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs) in solid tumors with chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia (CIT). METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, FMRS, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, EMBASE, and ClinicalTrials.gov for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting the efficacy and safety of TPO-RAs in solid tumors with CIT. The search was limited to articles published before April 30, 2022. Primary outcomes included chemotherapy dose reduction or delays, platelet transfusion, the incidence of grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia, and bleeding events. Secondary outcomes encompassed the incidence of platelet count > 400 × 109/L, adverse events (AEs), serious AEs, thrombosis, and mortality. RESULTS: Our analysis encompassed six studies: five rigorous RCTs and one unique study comparing romiplostim to an observation group, involving a total of 489 patients. For primary outcomes, TPO-RAs significantly reduced the incidence of grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia (RR = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.52-0.91). After applying the Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons, the significance of the reduction in grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia incidence persisted (P = 0.008). TPO-RAs showed no significant impact on chemotherapy dose reduction or delays (RR = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.65-1.01), platelet transfusion (RR = 1.04, 95% CI: 0.48-2.27), or bleeding events (RR = 0.50, 95% CI: 0.23-1.10). In terms of safety, there were no significant difference in the incidence of any AEs (RR = 0.98, 95% CI:0.92-1.04), serious AEs (RR = 0.79, 95% CI:0.45-1.40), thrombotic events (RR = 1.20, 95% CI:0.51-2.84) and mortality (RR = 1.15, 95% CI:0.55-2.41). CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis suggests that TPO-RAs are generally well-tolerated. However, their efficacy in solid tumors with CIT appears limited, as they only demonstrate a reduction in the incidence of grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia.

Markers of refractory primary immune thrombocytopenia.

Refractory immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is a challenging disease that can be defined by refractoriness to second-line treatments. In this review, we list and comment available evidence about clinical and biological factors associated with refractoriness to splenectomy, thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs), rituximab and fostamatinib, as well as those associated with multirefractory ITP (active disease with failure of rituximab, TPO-RAs and splenectomy).

Immune thrombocytopenia secondary to primary cytomegalovirus infection after renal transplantation treated with a thrombopoietin receptor agonist: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an acquired disorder characterised by a low platelet count due to immune-mediated destruction and impaired platelet production. Here we report a rare case of primary cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection followed by thrombocytopenia after renal transplantation (RT). CASE PRESENTATION: A 24-year-old male patient with end-stage kidney disease secondary to hereditary focal segmental glomerulosclerosis was treated with peritoneal dialysis and received ABO-compatible living-related RT from his aunt. Nine months after the RT, the patient was diagnosed with primary CMV infection. After initiating treatment for primary CMV infection, the patient developed thrombocytopenia. After excluding other diseases or drugs that may cause thrombocytopenia, the patient was finally diagnosed with ITP, administered prednisolone (PSL), and started on Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy. Tapering the PSL dose was difficult, but thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs) were effective. CONCLUSIONS: In this case, the patient was diagnosed with ITP, and other causes of thrombocytopenia after RT were successfully ruled out. This case report demonstrates that RT recipients can develop ITP after CMV infection, and, in such cases, TPO-RAs may be an attractive option as a second-line therapy.

Real-world use of avatrombopag in patients with chronic liver disease and thrombocytopenia undergoing a procedure.

The phase 4 observational cohort study assessed the effectiveness and safety of the thrombopoietin receptor agonist avatrombopag in patients with chronic liver disease (CLD) and thrombocytopenia undergoing a procedure. Patients with CLD may have thrombocytopenia, increasing the risk of periprocedural bleeding. Prophylactic platelet transfusions used to reduce this risk have limitations including lack of efficacy and transfusion-associated reactions. Prophylactic thrombopoietin receptor agonists have been shown to increase platelet counts and decrease platelet transfusions. Effectiveness was assessed by change from baseline in platelet count and proportion of patients needing a platelet transfusion. Safety was assessed by monitoring adverse events (AEs). Of 50 patients enrolled, 48 were unique patients and 2 patients were enrolled twice for separate procedures. The mean (standard deviation) change in platelet count from baseline to procedure day was 41.1 × 109/L (33.29 × 109/L, n = 38), returning to near baseline at the post-procedure visit (change from baseline -1.9 × 109/L [15.03 × 109/L], n = 11). The proportion of patients not requiring a platelet transfusion after baseline and up to 7 days following the procedure was 98% (n = 49). Serious AEs were infrequent (n = 2 [4%]). No treatment-emergent AEs were considered related to avatrombopag. There were 2 mild bleeding events, no thromboembolic events or deaths, and no patients received rescue procedures (excluding transfusions). This study found that in a real-world setting, treatment with avatrombopag was well tolerated, increased the mean platelet count by procedure day, and reduced the need for intraoperative platelet transfusions in patients with CLD and thrombocytopenia.

Treatment of immune thrombocytopenia during pregnancy with thrombopoietin receptor agonists.

The introduction of thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs) led to a paradigm shift in the management of immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). However, TPO-RAs are not approved for use during pregnancy due to the absence of evidence and concerns for possible effects on the fetus due to their expected transplacental transfer. This comprehensive review examines the safety and efficacy of TPO-RA in 45 pregnancies of women with ITP (romiplostim n = 22; eltrombopag n = 21; both in the same pregnancy n = 2). Mothers experienced failure of the median of three treatment lines during pregnancy prior to TPO-RA administration. A platelet response (>30 × 109 /L) was seen in 86.7% of cases (including a complete response >100 × 109 /L in 66.7%) and was similar between eltrombopag and romiplostim (87.0% and 83.3%, p = 0.99). The maternal safety profile was favourable, with no thromboembolic events encountered. Neonatal thrombocytopenia was noted in one third of cases, with one case of ICH grade 3, and neonatal thrombocytosis was observed in three cases. No other neonatal adverse events attributable to TPO-RAs were seen. This review suggests that the use of TPO-RA during pregnancy is associated with a high response rate and appears safe. Nevertheless, TPO-RA should not be routinely used in pregnancy and should be avoided in the first trimester until further evidence is accumulated.

[Consensus on the clinical diagnosis, treatment and prevention of cancer treatment-induced thrombocytopenia in China (2023 edition)].

Cancer treatment-induced thrombocytopenia (CTIT) is a common adverse event during anti-tumor treatment, of which incidence is related to tumor classification, regimens, course of chemotherapy, etc. CTIT may result in a series of events including bleeding, dose intensity reduction, chemotherapy delay, and in severe cases, even the need for platelet transfusion, ultimately affecting the implementation of treatment plan, increasing the cost of treatment, reducing treatment effect and quality of life, and leading to a poor prognosis. The treatment of CTIT should first identify the cause, assess the risk of bleeding, and then adopt treatment strategies according to the cause and severity of CTIT. The main treatments of CTIT include platelet transfusion, application of various types of platelet-producing drugs, and measures to reduce the additional loss of platelets. Among them, platelet-producing drugs mainly refer to platelet-stimulating factors, including recombinant human thrombopoietin (rhTPO), recombinant human interleukin 11(rhIL-11), and thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs). In addition, traditional Chinese medicine also has some assistance in raising platelets. Pharmacological prophylaxis in high-risk patients may help reduce the incidence and severity of CTIT. This consensus aims to support Chinese oncologists in the diagnosis and treatment of CTIT in China, reduce the risk of bleeding and improve the quality of life of patients.

Combining thrombopoietin receptor agonists with immunosuppressive drugs in adult patients with multirefractory immune thrombocytopenia, an update on the French experience.

Combining drugs could be an effective option for treating multirefractory ITP, that is, patients not responding to rituximab, thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RA) and splenectomy. We conducted a retrospective, multicenter, observational study including multirefractory ITP patients who received a combination of a TPO-RA and an immunosuppressive drug. We included 39 patients (67% women, median age 59 years [range 21-96]), with a median ITP duration of 57 months [3-393] and a median platelet count at initiation of 10 × 109 /L [1-35]. The combination regimen was given for a median duration of 12 months [1-103] and included eltrombopag (51%) or romiplostim (49%), associated with mycophenolate mofetil (54%), azathioprine (36%), cyclophosphamide (5%), cyclosporin (3%) or everolimus (3%). Overall, 30 patients (77%) achieved at least a response (platelet count ≥30 × 109 /L and at least doubling baseline during at least 3 months), including 24 complete responses (platelet count >100 × 109 /L during at least 3 months) with a median time to response of 30 days [7-270] and a median duration of response of 15 months [4-63]. Severe adverse event related to ITP treatment was observed in 31%. In conclusion, this study confirms that some patients with multirefractory ITP can achieve long lasting response with this combination.

Emerging data on thrombopoietin receptor agonists for management of chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia.

INTRODUCTION: Chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia (CIT) is a common complication of cancer treatment, frequently leading to reduced relative dose intensity, and is associated with reduced survival. Given the lack of FDA-approved therapies for CIT, thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs) have received significant attention for treatment and prevention of CIT. AREAS COVERED: This review will summarize the development of prior agents for treatment of CIT, discuss the existing literature investigating the use of TPO-RAs in CIT primarily in patients with solid tumor malignancies, and offer insights on the future direction of TPO-RAs and other therapeutics for CIT. EXPERT OPINION: In alignment with NCCN guidelines, we recommend that patients with CIT participate in a clinical trial for consideration of TPO-RA treatment or consider off-label use of romiplostim when participation in clinical trials is not possible. The literature to date supports the use of TPO-RAs for treatment of persistent CIT. Further data is needed to describe the long-term efficacy, safety, and prescribing practices of TPO-RAs in a diverse patient population with a variety of tumor types and chemotherapy regimens in addition to exploring the underlying biology of CIT.

Additional efficacy analysis of avatrombopag phase III data for the treatment of adults with immune thrombocytopenia.

Avatrombopag is an oral thrombopoietin receptor agonist (TPO-RA) that was approved in the US in 2019 for treatment of chronic immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). This post hoc analysis of the pivotal phase III study (NCT01438840) of avatrombopag in adult patients with ITP evaluated platelet count response to avatrombopag during the core study in different subgroups, and durability of response data in patients who responded to avatrombopag treatment both during the core phase (total population) and during the core and extension phase (total population and by subgroup). Loss of response (LOR [platelet count <30 × 109/L]) was defined as LOR over two consecutive scheduled visits. The response was generally similar between subgroups though a few differences were observed. The durability of response analysis showed that avatrombopag-treated patients maintained their response for 84.5% of time on treatment during the core phase and 83.3% during the core and extension phase; 55.2% of patients in the core phase and 52.3% in the core and extension phase never experienced LOR. We conclude that the initial response to avatrombopag is both stable and durable.

What is the context? Avatrombopag is a medicine that helps the body produce platelet cells, which are necessary for blood clotting.Avatrombopag is used to treat people with chronic immune thrombocytopenia (ITP); these patients have low numbers of platelet cells in their blood, so their blood may not clot efficiently, putting them at risk of uncontrolled bleeding.A phase III clinical study in patients with chronic ITP showed that platelet counts increased for most patients who were treated with avatrombopag; patients who had a platelet count ≥50 × 10⁹/L were considered to have a response to avatrombopag treatment.The present study analyzes data from a phase III clinical study to determine whether there are any characteristics that make a patient more or less likely to have a loss of response (LOR) while taking avatrombopag, whether the initial response to avatrombopag is stable, and how long the response lasts.For this analysis, LOR is defined as platelet count <30 × 10⁹/L for either four consecutive weeks or for two consecutive office visits while taking avatrombopag.What is new? In general, patient characteristics did not influence the likelihood of LOR.Patients who responded maintained their response for most of the time they were taking avatrombopag.Most patients did not experience LOR.What is the impact? The initial response to avatrombopag is stable and long-lasting in patients with chronic ITP.These findings indicate that patients with a variety of background characteristics can experience a durable platelet response with avatrombopag treatment.

Efficacy and safety of thrombopoietin receptor agonists in children and adults with persistent and chronic immune thrombocytopenia: a meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: In this paper, we systematically review the efficacy and safety of thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPORAs) for treatment of persistent and chronic immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) in children and adults. METHODS: We searched PubMed, MEDLINE, ScienceDirect, Scopus, EMbase and the Cochrane Library to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of TPO-RAs which including avatrombopag hetrombopag eltrombopag and romiplostim treated persistent and chronic ITP from their earliest records to February 2022. RESULTS: We included 15 RCTs with a total of 1563 patients. There were ten trials of adults and five trials of children. The results of meta-analysis showed that in adult patients, patients treated with TPO-RAs had longer duration of platelet response, higher platelet response rate, lower use of rescue therapy, and lower incidence of bleeding events, and similar incidence of adverse events compared with placebo. Except for the incidence of any bleeding, the results in children were consistent with those in adults. The network meta-analysis of data on overall platelet response rates in adults showed that avatrombopag was more effective than eltrombopag and hetrombopag. CONCLUSIONS: TPO-RAs has better efficacy and higher safety in the treatment of ITP. And the overall response rate of avatrombopag in adults was higher than that in eltrombopag and hetrombopag.

Current Concepts in the Diagnosis and Management of Adult Primary Immune Thrombocytopenia: Our Personal View.

Primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an acquired blood disorder that causes a reduction in circulating platelets with the potential for bleeding. The incidence of ITP is slightly higher in adults and affects more women than men until 60 years, when males are more affected. Despite advances in basic science, primary ITP remains a diagnosis of exclusion. The disease is heterogeneous in its clinical behavior and response to treatment. This reflects the complex underlying pathophysiology, which remains ill-understood. Platelet destruction plays a role in thrombocytopenia, but underproduction is also a major contributing factor. Active ITP is a proinflammatory autoimmune disease involving abnormalities within the T and B regulatory cell compartments, along with several other immunological abnormalities. Over the last several years, there has been a shift from using immunosuppressive therapies for ITP towards approved treatments, such as thrombopoietin receptor agonists. The recent COVID-19 pandemic has hastened this management shift, with thrombopoietin receptor agonists becoming the predominant second-line treatment. A greater understanding of the underlying mechanisms has led to the development of several targeted therapies, some of which have been approved, with others still undergoing clinical development. Here we outline our view of the disease, including our opinion about the major diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. We also discuss our management of adult ITP and our placement of the various available therapies.

Safety of romiplostim and eltrombopag for children with immune thrombocytopenia: a pharmacovigilance study of the FDA adverse event reporting system database.

BACKGROUND: Romiplostim and eltrombopag are thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPORAs) that have been approved by the FDA on 22 August 2008 and 20 November 2008 for pediatric immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). However, postmarketing pharmacovigilance of TPORAs in children still attracts much attention. We aimed to evaluate the safety of the TPORAs romiplostim and eltrombopag using data from the Adverse Event Reporting System database of FDA (FAERS). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We conducted a disproportionality analysis and analyzed data from the FAERS database to characterize the key features of adverse events (AEs) associated with TPO-RAs approved for children under 18 years of age. RESULTS: Since their approval in the market in 2008, 250 and 298 reports of romiplostim and eltrombopag use in children have been published in the FAERS database, respectively. The most frequent AE associated with romiplostim and eltrombopag was epistaxis. Neutralizing antibodies and vitreous opacities showed the strongest signals for romiplostim and eltrombopag, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The labeled AEs for romiplostim and eltrombopag in children were analyzed. Unlabeled AEs may reflect the potential of new clinical individuals. Early recognition and management of AEs that appear in children treated with romiplostim and eltrombopag are of key importance in clinical practice.